OMO@c #2 Homage or Plagiar(boot)ism?

I very much appreciated a recent Shoecast segment (12.20.22) about plagiar(boot)ism and that more recent Middle Kingdom brand that makes really nice looking boots that appear to be very well made that are, well, plagiarism. There's such a thing as too close for comfort. I once edited a major academic journal (it was an onerous, horrible, thankless job) and I told contributors that our one unforgivable sin would be passing off something as yours that is, in fact, not yours. Of course most good ideas, like many kinds of boots, have all been done before and variations on the theme are how it goes.

In classical Sanskrit literature Buddhist and Hindu philosophers routinely misrepresent each others' views and blatantly, shamelessly, rip each other off when an idea is a good idea and claim it to be their own. (I have documented this, it's not a put down.) It's more a cultural fact than "plagiarism" as such. Or is it? Either way, it's not cool to take shit that ain't yours and do it to be a lookalike. It would be worse if they weren't so talented---the same being true of those talented philosophers.

"There is nothing new under the sun," says the Preacher (Ecclesiastes 1.9(ish)) but it's at the very least not nice to not give credit, acknowledge, or care that you're stealing stuff because you can.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Walk Through the Park in the Himel Excelsior

High Rise, Going Straight and the End of Too Tight

The Ship John Wills Jacket